Engis Equipment Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest is limited to certain merchandise included in two of the entries involved herein. Each entry involves identical items. They are described on the respective invoices as follows:
Invoice with entry 17824
2 Viewing Screens complete
2 Illuminating Systems without filter unit
2 Filter Units
2 Alternative Eyecup Filters
Invoice with entry 13457
1 Viewing Screen complete
1 Illuminating System without filter unit
1 Filter Unit
1 Alternative Eyecup Filter
4 Illuminating Units
The record shows that the merchandise, described as “Illuminating Units” on the invoice with entry 13457,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
- M. B. I. Export & Import, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Seawol Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
- British Auto Parts, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- Sullivan v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chas. Kurz Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Engis Equipment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Parker-Hartford Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965