Legal Opinion

In re Hummer

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 21, 1957No. 6237PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of the only remaining claims in appellant’s application which are as follows:

22. A hollow sectional plaster board partition each section composed of two spaced paper sheathed face plaster boards of equal width and laterally offset, and a spacer at each lateral edge comprising a relatively narrow- filler strip of paper sheathed plaster board between and adhesively secured to each face board and having its outer edge disposed midway between the offset…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  2. Application of PappasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. In Re TamarinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Application of DemarcheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. In re MengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  3. In re DevineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Application of Hubert C. Wynne and Frank CousenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Application of Norman A. Altmann and William H. BureauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API