In re Hummer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Rich, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of the only remaining claims in appellant’s application which are as follows:
22. A hollow sectional plaster board partition each section composed of two spaced paper sheathed face plaster boards of equal width and laterally offset, and a spacer at each lateral edge comprising a relatively narrow- filler strip of paper sheathed plaster board between and adhesively secured to each face board and having its outer edge disposed midway between the offset…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of McKennaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Application of PappasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- In Re TamarinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of DemarcheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re CitronCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- In re MengCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- In re DevineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of Hubert C. Wynne and Frank CousenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Application of Norman A. Altmann and William H. BureauCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.