Legal Opinion

Application of Norman A. Altmann and William H. Bureau

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 22, 1959No. Patent Appeal 6389PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’CONNELL, Acting Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the Primary Examiner’s rejection, as unpatentable over the cited art of record, of claims 11 to 15, inclusive, in appellants’ application for a patent on a method of deinking waste paper. Claim 11, which is representative of the appealed claims, reads as follows:

“11. The method of deinking waste paper in cool or cold water without cooking and use of deinking chemicals, so as to reclaim a large per cent of the fiber content as clean pulp suitable for re-use in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of PappasCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  2. In re HummerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Claus L. SporckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of Philip S. Fay and Fred J. FoxCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
  3. Application of Claus L. SporckCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API