Legal Opinion

In re Citron

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 22, 1958No. 6276PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

This appeal is from the rejection by the Patent Office Board of Appeals, acting under Patent Office Rule 196 (b), of all the claims of Citron’s application serial No. 163,787, filed May 23, 1950, entitled “Method of Implanting Cancer Tissue.”

Applicant’s claims, in this atypical case, were finally rejected by the examiner without the citation of any references on the sole ground that they were not directed to statutory patentable subject matter. There are 18 claims all directed to process or method. The examiner rejected them on the ground that “they do not comprise a ‘process’ within the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HummerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Arthur B. Steele, Jr., Edward J. Mills, Jr., and Donald G. LeisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of Hubert C. Wynne and Frank CousenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. Application of Arthur B. Steele, Jr., Edward J. Mills, Jr., and Donald G. LeisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. Application of Arthur B. Steele, Jr., Edward J. Mills, Jr., and Donald G. LeisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Application of Arthur B. Steele, Jr., Edward J. Mills, Jr., and Donald G. LeisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API