Legal Opinion
Pauker v. Roig
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 28, 1995No. 14984PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
In this tax appeal, the only issue is whether it is proper to revalue and reassess real property once a subdivision of the property has been approved and recorded, even though the conditions attached to the subdivision approval have not yet been fulfilled. The plaintiffs, Richard and Joyce Pauker (taxpayers), filed an amended complaint pursuant to General Statutes § 12-119,1 alleging that the defendants, *337Linda Roig, the tax assessor of the town of Weston, and the town of Weston had grossly overvalued the taxpayers’ property. Both parties moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Board of Tax Review of FranklinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Uniroyal, Inc. v. Board of Tax Review of the Town of MiddleburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- 84 Century Ltd. Partnership v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hartford/Windsor Healthcare Properties, LLC v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- DeSena v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Jupiter Realty Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Davis v. Town of WestportConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.