McCormick-Morgan, Inc. v. Teledyne Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION RE DISCOVERY
WAYNE D. BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Having considered the parties’ written and oral submissions regarding defendant/ counterclaimant, TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES, INC.’s (“Teledyne”) Motion to Compel Discovery, and plaintiff, counter-defendant McCORMICK-MORGAN, INC.’s (“MMI”) motion for a protective order, the court hereby enters the following opinion and ORDER.
I. Introduction And Background
The disputes addressed here involve the scope of waiver of the attorney-client privilege and issues related to depositions noticed under F.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6). On December…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Convergent Technologies Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Money Market 1 Institutional Investment DealerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. MorelliDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.