Legal Opinion

Lantis Eyewear Corp. v. Luxottica Group S.P.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered January 14, 2002, which denied defendant Ray-Ban Optics’ motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint and upon Ray-Ban’s second and third counterclaims, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff was the exclusive distributor for a line of sunglasses manufactured by Bausch & Lomb, the predecessor in interest of defendant Ray-Ban Sim Optics. Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for Ray-Ban’s alleged breach of the parties’ three-year distributor agreement entered into in 1998, which plaintiff maintains was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Bamira v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. LoFrisco v. Winston & Strawn LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Discovision Associates v. Fuji Photo Film Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Ask Jeeves, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API