Legal Opinion

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Ask Jeeves, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 30, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered August 21, 2009, which denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The agreement between the parties was ambiguous, with each side offering its own reasonable interpretation (see LoFrisco v Winston & Strawn LLP, 42 AD3d 304, 307 [2007]; Lantis Eyewear Corp. v Luxottica Group, 294 AD2d 127, 128 [2002]). Furthermore, the extrinsic evidence presented does not resolve the ambiguity or determine the parties’ intent at the time they entered the agreement (see NFL Enters. LLC v Comcast Cable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. NFL Enterprises LLC v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. LoFrisco v. Winston & Strawn LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Lantis Eyewear Corp. v. Luxottica Group S.P.A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Phipps Houses Services, Inc. v. New York-Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Phipps Houses Services, Inc. v. New York-Presbyterian HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API