Legal Opinion

Doe v. Baum

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 26, 2024No. 4:21-cv-12492Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JANE DOE, Plaintiff, Case No. 21-12492 v. Honorable Shalina D. Kumar Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 43) I. Introduction Plaintiff Jane Doe claims that defendant University of Michigan (the “University”) violated Title IX of The Education Act Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), see

20 U.S.C. § 1681

(Count I); University-employee- defendants David Baum, Elizabeth Seney, Margaret Gyetko, and Chung Owyang…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  5. Kathryn Keys v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API