Legal Opinion

Stamey v. Hemple

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1910No. 1,683PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The complaint is said to be demurrable on two distinct grounds: First, that the oral agreement to extend the life of the option is void as within the statute of frauds, so that there was no consideration for the defendant’s promise to do the assessment work; and, second, that, conceding the contract to be valid, the measure of the plaintiff’s damages was not the value of the mining claims which he lost.

If an agreement required to be in writing under-the statute of frauds is modified by a subsequent oral agreement, which does not in itself constitute a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Atlee v. BartholomewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Scheerschmidt v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Clark v. . FeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Kissack v. BourkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Platt v. ButcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. National Bank of Alaska v. J. B. L. & K. of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hayes Mfg. Corp. v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Wooten v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. Bemis Bros. Bag Co. v. NesbittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. Lannom Manufacturing Co. v. Strauss Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API