Legal Opinion

Lannom Manufacturing Co. v. Strauss Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1944No. 46495PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, J.-

Plaintiff’s petition, filed January 5, 1940, asserted that on or about July 28, 1939, plaintiff sold and delivered to defendant 117 pairs of shoes at a price of $2 per pair and demanded judgment for $234, with interest and costs. The answer was a general denial. Trial was had to the court without a jury. The court found that there had been a breach of contract, but that plaintiff’s remedy was for damages, not for the contract price; that there was no basis in the pleadings or the evidence for a judgment for damages because plaintiff made no attempt to plead or prove specifically…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lillard v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  2. Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Campfield v. SauerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  5. Dwiggins v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. DeWaay v. MuhrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  2. Shewry v. HeuerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Nizzi v. Laverty Sprayers, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Tow v. Truck Country of Iowa, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  5. Williams v. LongCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API