Legal Opinion

Light v. General Battery Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1990No. 2869Published

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

Donald Light appeals from the trial court’s order sustaining appellees’ preliminary objections in this action concerning an employer’s subrogation rights under Section 319 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The trial court found as a matter of law that an employer is entitled to subrogation when the employee receives a settlement from a third party, even if there has been no adjudication of the third party’s liability and the third party denies liability. We agree with the trial court; accordingly, we affirm.

In January 1981, appellant Donald Light was employed by appellee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Framlau Corp. v. Delaware CountySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Travelers Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Heiser v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. City of Pittsburgh v. RUECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API