Legal Opinion
Heiser v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 4, 1986No. Appeal, 723 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Raymond Heiser (claimant) has filed a petition for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (board) affirming a referee’s determination that pursuant to Section 319 of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act), Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, as amended, 77 P.S. §671, the Westmoreland Casualty Company (carrier) wias entitled to a subrogation credit against the payment of future compensation benefits and to a suspension of benefits for the balance of the credit from funds recouped by the .claimant in settlement in a personal injury suit.
While…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Bumbarger v. BUMBARGERSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Travelers Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Olin Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Broderick v. Great Lakes Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sussman v. OstroffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- PMA Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Helms Express v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Powell v. Sacred Heart HospitalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Warner Lambert Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.