Legal Opinion

Ladd v. Nashville Booting, LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided May 11, 2023No. 3:20-cv-00626Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ANTHONY LADD et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) NO. 3:20-cv-00626 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) NASHVILLE BOOTING, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed class. (Doc. No. 56, “Motion”). Defendant filed a response. (Doc. No. 65). Plaintiffs filed a reply.1 (Doc. No. 74, “Reply”). For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND During the relevant time period, § 6.81.170(E) of the Code of the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API