Ladd v. Nashville Booting, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ANTHONY LADD et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) NO. 3:20-cv-00626 v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) NASHVILLE BOOTING, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to certify the proposed class. (Doc. No. 56, “Motion”). Defendant filed a response. (Doc. No. 65). Plaintiffs filed a reply.1 (Doc. No. 74, “Reply”). For the reasons stated herein, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND During the relevant time period, § 6.81.170(E) of the Code of the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.