Legal Opinion
Gavlak v. Town of Somers
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 13, 2003No. 302CV1410(GLG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, David Gavlak and Hillside Springs Farm, Inc. (Hillside), have brought this federal action against the defendants, Town of Somers (Town) and the Somers Zoning Board of Appeals (Board), claiming that the defendants deprived them of their property without just compensation under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and violated their rights to Due Process and Equal Protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. 1 The defendants moved to dismiss [Doc. 11] the plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (6). We find that the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bower Associates v. Town of Pleasant ValleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Canadian St. Regis Band of Mohawk Indians Ex Rel. Francis v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Country View Estates @ Ridge LLC v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. New York City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Beechwood Restorative Care Center v. LeedsDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.