Legal Opinion
Chemtall, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided December 21, 2017No. 2016-2380PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
This customs classification case requires us to define the term “amide” as used in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). In particular, we are called on to distinguish between “Amides” and “Other” in a heading of the HTSUS that covers amides, their derivatives, and salts thereof. Chemtall, Inc. appeals from a decision of the Court of International Trade holding that Chemtall’s product, aerylamido tertiary butyl sulfonic acid (“ATBS”), is not an amide, but is a derivative of an amide. Chemtall, Inc. v. United States, 179 F.Supp.3d 1200 (Ct. Int’l…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Adc Telecommunications, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Well Luck Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Apple Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Primesource Building Products, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.