Legal Opinion
Wittman v. Saenz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 2004No. 02-17252PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Appellant Charles Wittman appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaint (“Complaint”) against twenty-nine state and local government employees and agencies under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6).1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
The district court entered two orders in this case. In the first order, the district court dismissed Wittmaris claims against Judge Edwards and Commissioner McCarthy on the ground that they enjoyed absolute judicial immunity. It also dismissed Wittmaris challenges to the juvenile…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Roberts v. United States JayceesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Devereaux v. AbbeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Quiroz v. ShortDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Matusick v. Erie County Water AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- (PS)Seneka v. County of YoloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021