Legal Opinion
(PS)Seneka v. County of Yolo
District Court, E.D. California
Decided January 21, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01621Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANA SENEKA, No. 2:20-cv-01621-TLN-CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 COUNTY OF YOLO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this action and has paid the filing fee. (ECF No 1.) 18 Currently before the court are four motions to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. 19 (ECF Nos. 8, 10, 11, and 12.) For the reasons below, the court recommends granting the motions. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 This action arises from a custody dispute over…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.