Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Charles Bell Pontiac-Buick-Cadillac-GMC, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 3, 1986No. 85-872PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
496 So.2d 774 (1986)
Ex parte CHARLES BELL PONTIAC-BUICK-CADILLAC-GMC, INC., and Charles Bell.
(In re Ed Willie TRAYLOR v. Charles BELL, et al.)
85-872.
Supreme Court of Alabama.
October 3, 1986.
Robert S. Thompson, Tuskegee, for petitioner.
James R. Bowles of Bowles & Cottle, Tallassee, for respondent.
2Per curiam
This petition seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the transfer of a fraud action from the Montgomery County Circuit Court to the Macon County Circuit Court. The writ is denied.
It is undisputed that Charles Bell Pontiac-Buick-Cadillac-GMC, Inc., is a domestic corporation doing business in Macon County,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Chandler v. HunterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- CANDY H. v. Redemption Ranch, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1983
- Ex Parte FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
4Cited by34 opinions
- Ex Parte McInnisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Sieber v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Bethel v. ThornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Elmore County Com'n v. RagonaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Turner v. WilsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.