Legal Opinion

Morris v. MacK's Used Cars

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1992PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

REID, Chief Justice.

The purchaser, Darrell Morris, sued the seller, Mack’s Used Cars & Parts, Inc., for compensatory, treble, and punitive damages, alleging fraudulent concealment, breach of express warranty of title under T.C.A. § 47-2-312, breach of express warranty of description under T.C.A. § 47-2-313, breach of implied warranty of merchantability under T.C.A. § 47-2-314, and violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act forbidding unfair or deceptive acts under T.C.A. § 47-18-104(b)(6), (7).

The facts were not disputed. In September 1985 the defendant sold to Morris a vehicle…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. V.S.H. Realty, Inc. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  2. Haverlah v. Memphis Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Attaway v. Tom's Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Skinner v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  5. Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Win Myint and wife Patti KI. Myint v. Allstate Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Ganzevoort v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. SenderTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  5. Fayne v. VincentTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API