Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Davis
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FENDER, Chief Justice.
This is a Deceptive Trade Practice case, TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. secs. 17.-41-17.63 (Vernon Pamph.Supp.1986), in which the purchaser of a used truck recovered judgment for $534,016.00 plus attorneys’ fees of $20,000.00 from the seller. Appellant is Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (“Metro”). Appellee, William E. Davis, will be called “Davis.”
We affirm.
Davis was an independent trucker who purchased a 1979 Kenworth diesel truck for $48,500.00 from Metro in July of 1981 and traded in his old truck. In spite of the fact that the truck was (according to Davis) “fantastic”…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
- Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Howell Crude Oil Co. v. Donna Refinery Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
- Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Beach, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
- Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Morris v. MacK's Used CarsTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Mondragon v. Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.