Legal Opinion

Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1986No. 2-85-080-CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FENDER, Chief Justice.

This is a Deceptive Trade Practice case, TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. secs. 17.-41-17.63 (Vernon Pamph.Supp.1986), in which the purchaser of a used truck recovered judgment for $534,016.00 plus attorneys’ fees of $20,000.00 from the seller. Appellant is Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc. (“Metro”). Appellee, William E. Davis, will be called “Davis.”

We affirm.

Davis was an independent trucker who purchased a 1979 Kenworth diesel truck for $48,500.00 from Metro in July of 1981 and traded in his old truck. In spite of the fact that the truck was (according to Davis) “fantastic”…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Brown v. American Transfer & Storage Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Southwest Battery Corp. v. OwenTexas Supreme Court · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howell Crude Oil Co. v. Donna Refinery Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  2. Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Beach, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1987
  3. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc. v. DickensonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Morris v. MacK's Used CarsTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Mondragon v. Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API