Legal Opinion

National Bank v. Quinn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1988No. 65761PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This commercial law case presents for the court’s review a question centered on an interpretation of the terms “properly payable” and “authorized” found in this State’s codification of the Uniform Commercial Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 26, par. 1 — 101 et seq.). Specifically at issue here is a determination of the scope of the drawee bank’s responsibility to its customer under the provisions of section 4 — 401(1): “As against its customer, a bank may charge against his account any item which is otherwise properly payable from that account even though the charge creates an overdraft.” Ill.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Cold Storage Co. v. Central Manufacturing District BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Kosic v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Cosmopolitan State Bank v. Lake Shore Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  4. National Bank v. QuinnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Kuhn v. TumminelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Barber v. First National Bank of Chillicothe (In Re Ostrom-Martin, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 1995
  4. Spec-Cast, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Sanwa Business Credit Corp. v. Continental Illinois National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API