Legal Opinion

Nolan v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District Court of Grant County j before James K-. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Gillette, J.:

This action was commenced in the probate court of Grant county, to recover possession of a portion of the depot grounds and right of way in the town of Lamont, in said county, which at the time of bringing said action, to-wit, June 2, 1905, and from the 28th day of April, 1903, had been occupied by defendant under and by .force of a license from the plaintiff, which license provided that it should terminate on sixty days’ notice by the plaintiff railroad company, and provided that the defendant on receiving such notice should at once vacate such premises.…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re MorseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  2. Dolezal v. BostickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. DrabekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Burkhart v. LasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API