Legal Opinion

Modern Woodmen of America v. Terry

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1918No. 8568PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by Cora B. Terry against the Modern Woodmen of America. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion -by

GALBRAITH, C.

This is an action to recover the amount of a benefit certificate issued by the plaintiff in error to John. E. Bobbitt, and -was commenced by Cora B. Terry, claiming to be the beneficiary named in the said -certificate.

This is the second appeal in this case. The decision of the first appeal was filed December 21, 1915. See Modern Woodmen of America v. Terry, 54 Okla. 308, 153 Pac. 1124. The appeal in this case was- prosecuted from the ruling of t-lie trial court in sustaining a demurrer to certain parts of the answer of the defendant therein, wherein was set iip certain…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Krauss Et US. v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Goodrich v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  3. Goodrich v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Rumsey v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915
  5. Modern Woodmen of America v. TerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gettler v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Whitson v. Wetherbee Electric CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Cooper v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Dague v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API