Dague v. McCaslin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from -Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckinridge, Judge. Action by M. 0. McOa-slin and M. J. Mc-Dougle ag-ainst A. B. 0. Dague and others to recover $1,189.65 upon a verbal contract for drilling well in exploring for oil and gas. Judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtKennambr, J.
The defendants in error, M. G. MeOaslin and M. J. McDougle, commenced this -action in the superior court of Tulsa county against the plaintiffs in error, A. B. 0. Dague, O. B. McBride, and F. 0. Glynn, on the 24th day of November, 1914, to recover the sum of $1,1S9.65, with interest. The plaintiffs allege that about the first day of April, 1914, they entered into an oral contract with the defendants to drill a well for oil and gas on a tract of land located in Montgomery county, Kansas, and that under the terms of the contract of employment the defendants agreed to pay the plaintiffs the sum'…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kinney v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Adams v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Allen v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Modern Woodmen of America v. TerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Livingston Oil Corp. v. SheftsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923