Legal Opinion

In re estate of Riley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided April 1, 1921PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On application for decree of distribution.

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, Y. C.

The administrator of this estate shows in his hands a small fund for distribution to the next of kin; that certain of these next of kin have died in foreign states, intestate and without debts, and that no administrators have ever been appointed for either of them. He asks a decree of distribution from this coart *568directing the payment of the shares to which these next of kin were entitled, directly to the persons who are thevr respective next of kin; without the intervention of administration on the estates of the ancestors.

Such a decree could not, of course, be made in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fretwell v. McLemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of MullonNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Marshall v. Crow's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Young v. . KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Watson v. ByrdMississippi Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Huxley v. Security Trust Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
  2. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
  3. Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  4. In Re BradfordNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1940
  5. In Re WoodruffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API