Legal Opinion

Young v. . Kennedy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Civil ACTION, heard by MaeBae, Judge, upon exceptions to the report of a referee, at May Term, 1886, of Ieedell Superior Court. Both parties appealed. The facts appear in the opinion.'

1Opinion of the Court

(Hester v. Hester, 38 N.C. 9; Whitford v. Foy, 65 N.C. 265; Ransom v.McClees, 64 N.C. 17; Carr v. Askew, 94 N.C. 194; Baker v. The Railroad,91 N.C. 308, cited and approved). Both parties appealed.

The facts appear in the opinion. Thomas M. Young died in 1860, intestate, and A. L. Young took out letters of administration on his estate. He left a widow, Margaret J. Young, and two children, Mary and Thomas M. Young, junior. Mary died in 1862, aged seven years, and her distributive share in her father's estate was distributable between her mother and brother Thomas M. and J. H. Stewart, a maternal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baker v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. State Ex Rel. Whitford v. FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  3. Ransom v. . McCleesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  4. State Ex Rel. Carr v. AskewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  5. Hester v. . HesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lightner v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Kelly v. Odum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. In Re Will of HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Bean v. Bean.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. In re estate of RileyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API