Legal Opinion
Klockner Namasco Holdings Corp. v. Daily Access.Com, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided December 19, 2002No. CIV.A.1:01-CV-3536-RWSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STORY, District Judge.
This case is before the Court for consideration of Defendant Daily Access.Corn’s Motion for Order to Show Cause [24-1] and for Sanctions [24-2]. After reviewing the entire record, the Court enters the following Order.
Factual Background
On October 5, 2002, Defendant Daily Access.Com, Inc., (“DAC”) served a subpoena for the deposition of Lloyd Burkart (“Bur-kart”), a non-party witness, by personally serving Burkart’s wife with the subpoena at the Burkart residence. The subpoena re7 quired Burkart to appear for a deposition on October 11, 2002. On October 8, 2002,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gerard A. Harrison and Harrison Ranch, Inc. v. Carey Prather and William PratherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- In re Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1973
- First Nationwide Bank v. Shur (In Re Shur)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Conanicut Investment Co. v. Coopers & LybrandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Castleberry v. Camden CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
- Colors + v. Colors+ Counseling, LLC, et al.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Katz v. Beebe HealthcareDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024