Legal Opinion
In re Johnson & Johnson
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 30, 1973No. Misc. No. 87PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LATCHUM, District Judge.
Two matters are presently before the Court: (1) Johnson & Johnson’s petition to punish respondents, Jordan of Norway, Inc. (“Jordan-Delaware”), a Delaware corporation, and Per Lindbo (“Lindbo”), Leif Sandvik (“Sandvik”), and Kjell Holtermann (“Holtermann”), for contempt because they failed to appear for depositions as directed by subpoenas duces tecum issued out of this court, and (2) respondents’ motion to quash the subpoenas.
Briefly stated, the relevant background facts are as follows: A/S W. Jordan Borste & Penselfabrik, a Norwegian corporation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chemical Specialties Co. v. Ciba Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- United States v. Loft on 6th Floor of Building at 40 E. 12th StreetDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fisher v. Marubeni Cotton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Windsor v. MartindaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Ghandi v. Police Department of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- In Re GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Doe v. HersemannDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.