Legal Opinion
Conanicut Investment Co. v. Coopers & Lybrand
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1989No. Misc. 89-0195 (N.Y.); Civ. A. No. 88-0185-B (R.I.)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the Conanicut Investment Company, seeks an order permitting it to serve a deposition subpoena and a subpoena duces tecum upon a non-party witness, Leonard R. Smith, by delivering the subpoenas to Smith’s attorney. Smith’s deposition is sought in connection with an action pending in the District of Rhode Island. Conanicut Investment Co. v. Coopers & Lybrand, C.A. No. 88-0185-B.
On or about March 10, 1989, the deposition of Smith was noticed for March 30, 1989. A deposition subpoena and a subpoena duces tecum were given to a process-server for service upon…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gerard A. Harrison and Harrison Ranch, Inc. v. Carey Prather and William PratherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Federal Trade Commission v. Compagnie De Saint-Gobain-Pont-A-MoussonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
3Cited by9 opinions
- Windsor v. MartindaleDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1997
- Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. PenceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- King v. Crown Plastering Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1997
- Doe v. HersemannDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.