People v. Mathis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*780Reversal is mandated on the ground that the trial court, sua sponte, and over the defendant’s objection, submitted a copy of the indictment to the jury (see, People v Kelly, 76 NY2d 1013, 1014; People v Taylor, 76 NY2d 873, 874; People v Nimmons, 72 NY2d 830; People v Sanders, 70 NY2d 837; People v Brooks, 70 NY2d 896; People v Owens, 69 NY2d 585; People v Sotomayer, 173 AD2d 500; People v George, 162 AD2d 705). Unlike People v Moore (71 NY2d 684), the jury here did not seek any such information and the submission therefore cannot be justified on the basis of any statutory obligation to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. LouridoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. OwensNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. NimmonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. JackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004