Claim of Paiz v. Coastal Pipeline Products Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 1, 2000, which ruled that claimant was a minor when he sustained an injury in the course of his employment.
Claimant was injured while working as a laborer and filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 14-a (1), the benefits awarded “shall be double the amount otherwise payable if the injured employee at the time of the accident is a minor employed, permitted or suffered to work in violation of any provision of the labor law.” Claimant raised the issue of his entitlement to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Taylor v. M. Gold & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Claim of Karam v. Executive Charge/Love TaxiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Bathrick v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of Paiz v. Coastal Pipeline Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Claim of Montanaro v. C.H. Quay & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002