Legal Opinion

Claim of Paiz v. Coastal Pipeline Products Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 1, 2000, which ruled that claimant was a minor when he sustained an injury in the course of his employment.

Claimant was injured while working as a laborer and filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 14-a (1), the benefits awarded “shall be double the amount otherwise payable if the injured employee at the time of the accident is a minor employed, permitted or suffered to work in violation of any provision of the labor law.” Claimant raised the issue of his entitlement to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claim of Taylor v. M. Gold & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Claim of Karam v. Executive Charge/Love TaxiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Bathrick v. New York State Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Claim of Paiz v. Coastal Pipeline Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Claim of Montanaro v. C.H. Quay & SonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API