Legal Opinion
Claim of Karam v. Executive Charge/Love Taxi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed November 12, 1999, which ruled that an employer-employee relationship existed between claimant and Executive Charge/Love Taxi.
Upon determining that claimant was an employee of Executive Charge and, therefore, not an independent contractor, the Workers’ Compensation Law Judge restored claimant’s case to the calendar for the purpose of establishing accident, notice and causal relationship, for further development of the record on the issue of possible general-special employment in regard to the interrelationship between Executive…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDowell v. La VoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Dubnoff v. Feathers Sportswear, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Claim of Salerno v. Newsday, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by8 opinions
- Claim of Ogbuagu v. NgbadiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Sawyer v. Orange MotorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of McClam v. American Axle & ManufacturingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Wilson v. Roselli Moving & Storage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Claim of Malkin v. Love Taxi, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.