Legal Opinion
Claim of Paiz v. Coastal Pipeline Products Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMugglin, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed March 21, 2003, which ruled that claimant was entitled to an award of double compensation pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 14-a.
On this appeal, claimant’s employer, Coastal Pipeline Products Corporation, asserts that claimant is not entitled to an award of double compensation pursuant to Workers’ Compensation Law § 14-a, since claimant neither proved that he was a minor at the time of his accident nor that he was illegally employed in violation of any provision of the Labor Law.* We disagree and affirm.
On the issue of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Claim of Servidio v. North Shore University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Claim of De Marco v. Millbrook Equestrian CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Millner v. CablevisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ortiz v. Five Points Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ludwig v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claim of Pache v. Aviation Volunteer Fire Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Manka v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Claim of Manka v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- MatterofMankavGoodyearTireandRubberCompanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014