Legal Opinion

Hubert v. Werner

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1985No. 15101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary judgment in favor of respondents in a quiet title action. The dispute centered on the boundary line between two abutting pieces of property. Because material issues of fact remain in dispute, we reverse and remand this matter for further proceedings.

In 1974 respondents, the Werners, purchased a piece of property on the corner of Tropicana and Burnham Streets in Las Vegas. Appellant, Hubert, had purchased the lot immediately abutting and to the south of the Werners in 1968. Both lots and surrounding property were originally owned by Elva and Cecil Cope.…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Oak Grove Investors v. Bell & Gossett Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nehls v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1981

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dermody v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  3. A French Bouquet Flower Shoppe Ltd. v. HubertNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API