Legal Opinion

North Carolina Ex Rel. Horne v. Chafin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1983No. 8226SC463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

The sole question is whether the trial court erred in granting defendants’ motions for summary judgment. Summary judgment shall be rendered if “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). Since the facts are not at issue, the only question is whether defendants are entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.

Plaintiff argues that the expenditure of public…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Mitchell v. North Carolina Industrial Development Financing AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Peacock v. Georgia Municipal Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Brown v. WingardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Bardolph v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Opinion No. (1996), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API