Legal Opinion

Brown v. Wingard

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 17, 1985No. 22326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents commenced this action under the Declaratory Judgment Act. [S. C. Code Ann. § 15-53-10, et seq. (1976).] They challenge Greenwood’s payment of expenses for five of the appellants’ spouses, claiming it violates S. C. Code Ann. § 5-7-170 (1976). The trial court overruled appellants’ demurrer and granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment. We affirm and adopt the lower court’s order as modified.

Initially, appellants challenge respondents’ standing to bring this action. We think respondents stated a sufficient cause of action under the Declaratory Judgment Act. All that is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. CLARKSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  2. Peacock v. Georgia Municipal Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Hardwick v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  4. North Carolina Ex Rel. Horne v. ChafinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sloan v. School Dist. of Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  3. Holden v. CribbCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  4. FIREMEN'S INS. CO. OF NEWARK v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Firemen's Insurance v. Cincinnati InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API