Legal Opinion

City of Kennewick v. Board for Volunteer Firefighters

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 20, 1997No. 15105-1-IIIPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The City of Kennewick and five former volunteer fire fighters (the City) contend the State Board of the Volunteer Fire Fighters Pension Fund (the State Board) erroneously determined that individuals who perform no duties other than payment of an annual contribution to the pension fund are not active members entitled to participate in the pension program. We find no error and affirm.

Before 1979, the City employed both paid and volunteer fire fighters in its Fire Department. In 1980, the five volunteer fire fighters were placed on inactive status. Thereafter, the volunteers no longer performed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ElginWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tuerk v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Campbell v. Board for Volunteer FirefightersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Schrom v. Board for Volunteer FirefightersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API