Campbell v. Board for Volunteer Firefighters
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSchindler, J.
To be eligible for a pension, a volunteer fire fighter must be an “active member” of a fire department as well as a fire fighter. Here, the State Board for Volunteer Fire Fighters denied John Campbell pension credit for the years 1997 and 1998 because during those years Campbell’s activities in the department were minimal and mostly unrelated to fire fighting. The trial court reversed the Board’s decision. We reinstate the Board’s decision. The Board’s factual findings are supported by the evidence and the Board was correct as a matter of law.
FACTS
Between 1990 and 1996, John Campbell was a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Franklin County Sheriff's Office v. SellersWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Schrom v. Board for Volunteer Fire FightersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Schrom v. Board for Volunteer FirefightersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- Campbell v. VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERSCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.