California Ex Rel. Harris v. Safeway, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Concurrence by Judge FISHER; Partial Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
OPINION
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether an agreement among competitors to share revenues during the term of a labor dispute is exempt from the antitrust laws under the non-statutory labor exemption, and if not, whether the agreement should be condemned as a per se violation of the antitrust laws or on a truncated “quick look,” or whether more detailed scrutiny is required. We conclude that the agreement is not immune from the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Williams Hicks v. Pga Tour, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital v. Washington State Department of HealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- O'Bannon v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Teradata Corporation v. Sap SeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- United States v. AiyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.