Legal Opinion
Sohappy v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1976No. Nos. 74-2409, 74-2376 and 74-2617PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and LINDBERG,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:
On July 8, 1969, the district court filed its opinion and decree defining the treaty rights of the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation, the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Reservation (the Walla Walla, Cayuse, and Umatilla Tribes), the Nez Perce Indian Tribe of Idaho, and the Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Indian Reservation. It construed the treaty right “of taking fish at all usual and accustomed places” on the Columbia River and its tributaries, and declared the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Robert St. Helen, Movant v. Lt. Gen. W. C. Wyman, Maj. Gen. Edwin K. Wright, and Col. Jacob H. BlossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by20 opinions
- Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. William G. Gordon, and State of Oregon, Defendants-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. State of Oregon and State of Washington, and Confederated Tribes of the Warm Spring Reservation, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Idaho Ex Rel. Evans v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.