Legal Opinion

In re G.M.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2017No. 2016–T–0092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas R. Wright, J.

{¶ 1} Appellant, Heather Morgan, appeals the trial court's decision finding her in contempt for failing to comply with the pending visitation order. She contends that, as a result of her status as the custodial parent, she had the authority to change the visitation schedule to conform to her child's preschool schedule. We affirm.

{¶ 2} G.M. was born on February 5, 2009. Appellant is the child's mother, and appellee, Benjamin Ward, is her father.

{¶ 3} Early in the proceedings, the parties filed motions for the initial allocation of parental rights, but were ultimately able to resolve all…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Contex, Inc. v. Consolidated Technologies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. FlinnOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re D.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. In re D.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. In re D.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API