In re G.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtThomas R. Wright, J.
{¶ 1} Appellant, Heather Morgan, appeals the trial court's decision finding her in contempt for failing to comply with the pending visitation order. She contends that, as a result of her status as the custodial parent, she had the authority to change the visitation schedule to conform to her child's preschool schedule. We affirm.
{¶ 2} G.M. was born on February 5, 2009. Appellant is the child's mother, and appellee, Benjamin Ward, is her father.
{¶ 3} Early in the proceedings, the parties filed motions for the initial allocation of parental rights, but were ultimately able to resolve all…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Windham Bank v. TomaszczykOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Pugh v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Zakany v. ZakanyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Contex, Inc. v. Consolidated Technologies, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- State v. FlinnOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re D.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re D.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- In re D.S.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020