Legal Opinion

Helmar v. Harsche

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 26, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

KLEINER, J.A.D.

Defendants Walter Harsche and Weichert Realtors appeal from a judgment entered after a jury verdict which determined that defendants had committed consumer fraud, proscribed by the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -20, and were liable to plaintiff Cheryl N. Helmar for $5,450. The verdict was trebled by the judge to $16,350, as required by N.J.S.A. 56:8-19.

Plaintiffs three-count complaint alleged that defendants committed fraud, consumer fraud, and were negligent in the sale of real estate. Plaintiffs fraud complaint was summarily…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cogdell v. Hospital Center at OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. DiTrolio v. AntilesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  3. Petrillo v. BachenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  4. Circle Chevrolet Co. v. Giordano, Halleran & CieslaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  5. Mystic Isle Development Corp. v. Perskie & NehmadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. ZORBA CONT. v. Housing Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC VS. A&A MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY (L-1419-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019
  4. Cindy Hatfield v. Allenbrooke Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
  5. Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. Henry SenderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API