Legal Opinion

Davis & Rankin Bldg. & Manuf'g Co. v. Barber

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 20, 1894No. 62PublishedCited by 15 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United Hta.tes for the District of Indiana. Action by the Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Company against William W. Barber and 60 other defendants for breach of contract. A demurrer to the declaration was sustained, and the plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

JENKINS, Circuit Judge.

This cause is brought here seeking a review of the judgment of the court below sustaining the de murrers to the plaintiff’s declaration. The action was against some 61 subscribers to a contract with Davis and Rankin, the assignors of the plaintiff in error. This contract was for the construction of a creamery, and damages are sought for an alleged breach of the contract by the defendants. The demurrers go to the jurisdiction of the court below over the subject-matter of the action, and are predicated upon the theory that, by a proper construction of the contract…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLish v. RoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Davis & Rankin Bldg. & Manuf'g Co. v. BarberU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1892

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  2. Baltimore & O. R. v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1894
  3. Watkins v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
  4. Coler v. Grainger CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. United States ex rel. County of Iron v. SeverensCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API