City and County of Denver v. McNichols
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
The City and County of Denver filed its complaint in the district court, in which numerous defendants were named as representatives of several classes of persons whose interests, duties and obligations were involved with relation to a series of ordinances adopted by the Denver city council. As hereinafter more particularly detailed, the ordinances giving rise to the action involve the creation, enlargement and dissolution or termination of a plan for retirement and disability benefits for employees of the City and County of Denver.
In the complaint it was alleged, inter alia: “That, in order…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago, Wilmington & Vermilion Coal Co. v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- People Ex Rel. Barrett v. SbarbaroIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Coulter v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
- People v. FriederichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Hudson v. AnnearSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McNichols v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Evert v. OurenColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Brisnehan v. the Central Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- City & County of Denver v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
- Staats v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.