Legal Opinion
People v. Friederich
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 15, 1919No. 9265; No. 9266; No. 9267PublishedCited by 23 opinions
Error to the Juvenile Court of Denver, Hon. Royal R. ■ Graham, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey
The defendants were charged with contributing to juvenile delinquency. They moved to quash the informations, which motion was granted, upon the ground that the Act upon which the prosecutions were based is unconstitutional. These judgments are now here for review on writs of error sued out upon behalf of the People.
The Act on which the prosecutions are based is found at page 298, Session Laws 1911. The title of the Act is as follows:
“An Act for the protection of girls 18 years of age who are, or may become delinquent concerning persons who contribute to their delinquency.”
The body of the Act…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- People ex rel. Breckon v. Board of Election CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- People ex rel. Stuckart v. KnopfIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- Board of Penitentiary Commissioners v. SpencerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Edwards v. Denver & R. G. R.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1889
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. BarnhillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Thiele v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Post Printing & Publishing Co. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Armstrong v. Johnson Storage & Moving Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1928
- Waddell v. TraylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.