Legal Opinion

Brisnehan v. the Central Bank and Trust Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1956No. 17912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This action arises in connection with the creation, operation and termination of the retirement plan adopted by the City and County of Denver for the benefit. of employees of the municipality. For a full comprehension of the ordinances creating the retirement program and the subsequent procedures which brought about its termination, reference should be made to City and County of Denver v. McNichols, 129 Colo. 251, 268 P. (2d) 1026. Three other opinions of this Court have dealt with the various problems arising from the action of the City and County of Denver which terminated the retirement…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McNichols v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. City and County of Denver v. McNicholsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  3. City & County of Denver v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  4. Staats v. Central Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1956

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kaho'ohanohano v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Wisconsin Medical Society, Inc. v. MorganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance PlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. North Dakota Public Service Commission v. Valley Farmers Bean Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API