Legal Opinion
Tolen v. AH Robins Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 13, 1983No. L 81-72PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHARP, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before this court on the motion for summary judgment of the defendant, A.H. Robins Company, Inc., (Robins). Plaintiff, Carol Ann Fausett Tolen 1 , brought this action alleging that she was injured by the use of the Daikon Shield, an intrauterine contraceptive device manufactured and distributed by Robins. The sole issue to be addressed by the court is whether the present action is barred by the applicable statute of limitations. In light of the record presented ón this motion, the court concludes that there is no genuine issue of fact…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sidney-Vinstein v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Shideler v. DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Margaret Morgan v. Walter G. Koch, Ivan H. Morgan, Morgan Packing Co., Inc., Herman C. Krannert and Inland Container Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Virgil Jean v. William E. DuganCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Cardinal Health 301, Inc. v. Tyco Electronics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Research Systems Corporation v. Ipsos Publicite, Ipsos Usa, IpsosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Alexander v. Beech Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.