Legal Opinion

Crunk v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 17, 1996No. 14-93-00885-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YATES, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of murder and attempted murder. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by prior convictions, at forty-five years confinement for the murder conviction and twenty years confinement for the attempted murder conviction in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division. In three points of error, appellant alleges the trial court erred by (1) refusing his requested charge on conflicting factual issues; (2) admitting an unlawfully obtained document; and (3) refusing a requested charge on the lesser-ineluded offense of…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Rousseau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
  2. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
  3. Fields v. KeithDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
  4. State v. SamshalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Alexander Lyssy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API