Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioners v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 10, 1930No. C-745PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Judge

This case involves the question of the reformation of a written contract where it is claimed that the language of the contract does not clearly express the agreement and in*56tention of the parties. One of the parties to the contract was the Board of Commissioners of the Port of New Orleans, an agency of the State of Louisiana. They were acting in their public capacity and as trustees in the expenditure of a fund which under the authority of law had been raised by the sale of bonds secured by certain structures or improvements to be built by the city for improving conditions at the port. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Milliken Imprinting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. South Boston Iron Works v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1899
  3. Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923
  4. Heid Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1927
  5. Ætna Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southwest Welding & Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Bowen-McLaughlin-York Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  3. Lovell Clay Products Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API